{"id":14209,"date":"2018-07-10T13:55:52","date_gmt":"2018-07-10T17:55:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dyzedesign.com\/?p=14209"},"modified":"2024-05-30T09:34:10","modified_gmt":"2024-05-30T13:34:10","slug":"3d-print-speed-calculation-find-optimal-speed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dyzedesign.com\/fr\/2018\/07\/3d-print-speed-calculation-find-optimal-speed\/","title":{"rendered":"3D Printer Print Speed Calculation: How to find the optimal speed for reliable and constant print quality"},"content":{"rendered":"
[vc_row css= ».vc_custom_1531164437568{margin-bottom: 20px !important;} »][vc_column][vc_column_text]Choosing the right speed for your print can be quite a challenge, especially if you are new to 3D printing. After a bit of trial and error, you\u2019ll be able to guess a setting that will generally work. Still, you\u2019ll have a lot of variation with your results. Finally, you might not be using your hardware at its full potential by randomly choosing values.<\/p>\n
The print speed calculator has been developed to help you choose the right setting based on our experimental values. This blog will teach you the basics for understanding 3D printer extrusion, how we developed the calculator and why it can be very useful for you.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n
The slicer\u2019s automatic calculation consider the nozzle size and increase it by 20%. A general rule of thumb accepted by 3D printer users suggest a line width up to 50% bigger than the nozzle. Although this generally works fine in most cases, you\u2019ll see a big drop in print quality and consistency with bigger nozzles and layer height.[\/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image= »14213″ img_size= »full » add_caption= »yes » alignment= »center »][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n
[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css= ».vc_custom_1531241234891{padding-bottom: 15px !important;} »][vc_column][vc_column_text]The molten plastic is pushed in something like an oblong shape. For simplifications, we\u2019ll consider a perfect oblong shape. This flattening ensures a good bond between the layer underneath or the bed. Extruding a perfect circle would make very weak since each layer would barely be touching each other.[\/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image= »14215″ img_size= »large » alignment= »center » onclick= »link_image »][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n
[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css= ».vc_custom_1531241234891{padding-bottom: 15px !important;} »][vc_column][vc_column_text]This oblong radius is equal to half the line height. The radius is changing with the layer height. The higher the layer height, the larger is the radius. At some point, the traditional 20% increase in line width can\u2019t cut it and will under-extrude. Under extrusion happens when there is little to no line flat from the extruded oblong. The figure below shows an example where the extrusion has no flats. In this configuration, the layer height is equal to the line width. The line flat is equal to zero.[\/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image= »14214″ img_size= »large » alignment= »center » onclick= »link_image »][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row content_placement= »middle » css= ».vc_custom_1531241606662{padding-bottom: 15px !important;} »][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n
The minimum line width can be considered when the flat width is equal to the nozzle size. This ensures that the oblong shape is properly formed and uniform.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css= » »]<\/p>\n
\n
<\/p>\n
[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]For example, a 0.40mm nozzle with a 0.20mm should have a line width of at least 0.60mm.<\/p>\n
The figure below shows a minimal configuration for line width.<\/p>\n
Please note that the line width could actually be a little smaller than this suggested formula. The shape will slightly differ from the perfect oblong shape depending on the polymer flow. In most cases, a smaller line width is totally fine.[\/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image= »14216″ img_size= »large » alignment= »center » onclick= »link_image »][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row content_placement= »middle » css= ».vc_custom_1531241606662{padding-bottom: 15px !important;} »][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n
The maximum line width will depend on your nozzle flat width. Manufacturers should specify this dimension to configure your slicer accordingly. The maximum line flat should be equal to the nozzle flat. Note that any overflow will have an impact on top infill quality, as it will tend to rise around the nozzle.<\/p>\n
[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css= » »]<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]Considering a 0.40mm nozzle having a 0.80mm flat with a 0.20mm layer thickness have a maximum line width of 1.00mm.[\/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image= »14218″ img_size= »large » alignment= »center » onclick= »link_image »][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css= ».vc_custom_1531243097953{padding-top: 40px !important;} »][vc_column][vc_column_text css= ».vc_custom_1531241945070{padding-bottom: 15px !important;} »]<\/p>\n
It\u2019s common to see that 50% of your nozzle size is the sweet spot for printing. This works totally fine in most printing situations. It\u2019s also very frequent to hear that it\u2019s not good or possible to go higher in layer height than the nozzle diameter.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n
However, nothing is stopping you from going a lot higher or lower. For example, the two images below are the same exact Gcode, one ran with a 1.00mm nozzle, the other with a 0.40mm nozzle. The line height is 0.50mm and line width is 1.50mm.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width= »1\/2″][vc_single_image image= »14222″ img_size= »full » add_caption= »yes » alignment= »center » onclick= »link_image »][\/vc_column][vc_column width= »1\/2″][vc_single_image image= »14219″ img_size= »full » add_caption= »yes » alignment= »center » onclick= »link_image »][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]As you can see, there is barely any difference. As long as the 0.40mm nozzle flat is within the margin, the result is pretty good. In this case, the layer height was 125% the nozzle diameter.<\/p>\n
Smaller nozzle can still extrude large lines, but have more flow restrictions compared to larger nozzles. The speed must be decreased to get the same results.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width= »1\/2″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n
A similar test was done using a 1.00mm nozzle, but with 0.05mm layer height. In this set-up, the layer height is only 5% of the nozzle size. The results are quite interesting. The picture below shows a 20mm diameter half-sphere side by side with an AA battery. The zoom is pretty high, and we still have a hard time seeing the layers.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][vc_column width= »1\/2″][vc_single_image image= »14223″ img_size= »medium » alignment= »center » onclick= »link_image »][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Printing with such a big nozzle reduces your detail level on the XY plane compared to a smaller nozzle. However, the line are very thick, thus greatly reducing the infill and contour printing time.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css= ».vc_custom_1531243107040{padding-top: 40px !important;} »][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n
Choosing the right flow will save you a lot of trial and error before getting consistent results. Polymer flow variation can be understood in the following way:<\/p>\n
There is always a small slipping in the filament from the extruder. The faster you go, the greater is the slipping. Below is an example taken from the DyzEnd-X with few nozzles. You can see that the 1.20mm nozzle can output a lot more flow than the other nozzles. Also, the efficiency is decreasing by an exponential rate based on the output flow.[\/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image= »14224″ img_size= »large » alignment= »center » onclick= »link_image »][vc_column_text]Taking this into account, it\u2019s very important to choose the right speed and flow to get the same output. For example, doubling the flow from 5 mm3<\/sup>\/s to 10mm3<\/sup>\/s can reduce flow by around 3%. Same case with a 0.60mm nozzle will reduce flow by 2%, and less than 1% with a 1.20mm nozzle.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css= ».vc_custom_1531242175608{padding-top: 15px !important;} »]<\/p>\n Flow calibration is critical and the steps per mm must be precisely found. The values provided by the guide in support section gives a starting point. Due to manufacturing tolerance, this value can be different from one unit to another. It is suggested to calibrate your extruder without any hotend, as a baseline value for any users.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css= ».vc_custom_1531243115667{padding-top: 40px !important;} »][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n All these results were broke down into charts which are used in this calculator. Once you enter the desired layer parameters, the maximum printing speed is calculated. From this point, the user can choose a lower value if desired. The suggested flow is then adjusted based on the slower speed.<\/p>\n This flow adjustment is critical for dimensional accuracy. The pressure is reduced as the speed is farther from the maximum, thus requiring a slightly lower flow. Keeping the same flow for different speed might lead to a small difference in dimensions.<\/p>\n Printing with large nozzles can confuse some users as the speed might seems slow. In fact, when using a 1.00mm nozzle with a 0.50mm layer height and 1.50mm line width, the suggested speed is below 35mm\/s. Many users would be tempted to guess this speed at a much higher value.<\/p>\n The experiments are still undergoing and the calculator will be improved with more choices and more precise values.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css= ».vc_custom_1531242420465{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;} »][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n Choosing the proper parameters for speed and flow is quite an art. There are many rules of thumbs for helping in this task. However, as shown in this blog, they might not always be right or the optimal solution.<\/p>\n The print speed calculator has been developed for helping users defining their optimal speed and flow. This will greatly help improve part accuracy and consistency across materials and configurations.<\/p>\n I hope you enjoyed this article about this new tool. I\u2019ll be happy to complete it if I have forgotten or mistaken any information. Feel free to comment it and share your thoughts.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Choosing the right speed for your print can be quite a challenge. After a bit of trial and error, you\u2019ll be able to guess a setting that will generally work. Still, you\u2019ll have a lot of variation with your results. Our print speed calculator has been developed to help you choose the right setting based on our experimental values. This blog will teach you the basics for understanding 3D printer extrusion, how we developed the calculator, and why it can be very useful for you.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":14212,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[180],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14209","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-learning-tips"],"yoast_head":"\nFlow calibration<\/h3>\n
The print speed calculator<\/h2>\n
\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image= »14235″ img_size= »large » alignment= »center » onclick= »custom_link » img_link_target= »_blank » link= »\/3d-printing-speed-calculator\/ »][vc_column_text]With all this knowledge, it\u2019s now time to introduce the speed calculator<\/a>. The goal of this tool is to offer the most precise slicer configuration for your 3D printer. The data comes from multiple experimental tests in different configurations:<\/p>\n\n
Conclusion<\/h2>\n
\n\n